The "revision" this time should, of course, be a correctly formatted paper,
like the ones you have been writing all semester.
-
It should be fairly straightforward to turn the thinksheet outline
into full sentences and paragraphs (with correct citations if needed).
-
I strongly urge you to have someone peer-edit your paper before you
produce the final version!
Tell that person to make sure that you have:
- Evaluated each statement (premise and conclusion) for
("absolute" or "independent") truth or falsity
(see my
email (point #1) about that terminology),
and given a reason for your evaluation.
- Evaluated each argument for validity or invalidity
(i.e., evaluated each conclusion for "relative truth", i.e.,
truth relative to the premises),
and given a reason for your evaluation.
- Correctly used the "true"/"false"/"valid"/invalid"
terminology.
-
Failure to correctly distinguish among
"true (or false) sentences,
propositions, statements, premises, or conclusions"
and
"valid (or
invalid) arguments"
will result in a lower grade!
(After all, you
need to demonstrate that you've learned something this semester :-)
-
Your position paper should be approximately
-
At the top of the first page, please put the following information in
the following format:
Position Paper #4 |
|
YOUR NAME |
DATE DUE |
|
CSE 484 (or 584) (or PHI 584) |
-
Please attach the peer-edited thinksheets to your paper, as usual.
-
For general assistance with writing (including my preferred method of
paper preparation and format, as well as advice on grammar),
see my
website "How to Write".
As before, no
abstract is needed for this position paper, but you do need to give full
citations to any sources that you cite.
1–2 PAGE (250–500 WORD) PAPER, 1 COPY, TYPED, SINGLE-SIDED, DOUBLE-SPACED,
IS DUE
MONDAY, APRIL 5
NO LATE PAPERS WILL BE ACCEPTED!
|
Copyright © 2010 by
William J. Rapaport
(rapaport@buffalo.edu)
http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~rapaport/584/S10/peered4.html-20100328