Frames

1. Minsky, Marvin (1974), "A Framework for Representing Knowledge", Memo 306 (Cambridge, MA: MIT AI Lab).
   • Various portions reprinted in:
     • Winston, Patrick Henry (ed.) (1975), The Psychology of Computer Vision (New York: McGraw-Hill): 211-277.
       • This version reprinted in:
         Collins, Allan M. & Smith, Edward E. (eds.) (1988), Readings in Cognitive Science (San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann): 156-189.

     • Haugeland, John (ed.) (1981), Mind Design: Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 95-128.
       • This version reprinted in:
         Brachman, Ronald J. & Levesque, Hector J. (eds.) (1985), Readings in Knowledge Representation (Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann): 245-262.

       • and in:
         Haugeland, John (ed.) (1997), Mind Design II: Philosophy, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence; revised and enlarged edition (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 111-142.

2. Kuipers, Benjamin J. (1975), "A Frame for Frames: Representing Knowledge for Recognition," in D.G. Bobrow & A. Collins (eds.), Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science (Orlando, FL: Academic Press): 151-184.
   • Note: The Bobrow & Collins volume contains many other papers of relevance to KR.

3. Papers on KRL:
   1. Bobrow, Daniel G. & Winograd, Terry (1977), "An Overview of KRL, a Knowledge Representation Language", Cognitive Science 1(1): 3-46.
      • Reprinted in:
        Brachman, Ronald J. & Levesque, Hector J. (eds.) (1985), Readings in Knowledge Representation (Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann): 263-285.

   2. Bobrow, Daniel G.; Winograd, Terry; & The KRL Research Group (1977), "Experience with KRL-0: One Cycle of a Knowledge Representation Language", Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-77, MIT) (Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann): 213-222.

   3. Bobrow, Daniel G., & Winograd, Terry (1979), "KRL: Another Perspective", Cognitive Science 3(1): 29-42.

4. Hayes, Pat (1979), "The Logic of Frames", [PDF] in D. Metzing (ed.), Frame Conceptions and Text Understanding (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter): 46-61.
   • Reprinted in:
     Brachman, Ronald J. & Levesque, Hector J. (eds.) (1985), Readings in Knowledge Representation (Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann): 287-295.

5. link:
   Brachman, Ronald J.; Fikes, Richard E.; & Levesque, Hector J. (1983), "KRYPTON: A Functional Approach to Knowledge Representation", IEEE Computer 16(10): 67-73.
   • A revised version is reprinted in:
     Brachman, Ronald J. & Levesque, Hector J. (eds.) (1985), Readings in Knowledge Representation (Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufmann): 411-429.

   • 
     This issue of Computer was devoted to KRR; all the articles in it are online and important. It was later turned into an edited volume with a few deletions and a few additions, one of which was the addition of Shapiro & Rapaport 1987.

6. Fikes, Richard, & Kehler, Tom (1985), "The Role of Frame-Based Representation in Reasoning", Communications of the ACM 28(9): 904-920.

7. A good survey of schema theory, the general notion of which "frames" (and Schank's "scripts") are special cases, is:
   • Rumelhart, David E. (1980), "Schemata: The Building Blocks of Cognition", in Rand J. Spiro, Bertram C. Bruce, & William F. Brewer (eds.), Theoretical issues in Reading Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Psychology, Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, and Education (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates): 33-58.
     • LOCKWOOD Book Collection LB1050.45 T48

8. Some References on the Procedural-Declarative Controversy

9. Example of an object-oriented frame