Student Paper Presentations

One of the main goals of this course --- besides learning about wireless networks --- is to teach you to give good talks. You will present a paper in front of the class, in the hope that this experience will prepare you for giving talks at conferences, interview talks, etc. At the end of the semester, you may also present the results of your project to the class.

Below you will find a set of recommendations on how to give a good talk. Not all recommendations apply equally to all papers and to all speakers, and some comments are not directly applicable to classroom presentations, but they provide some guidance in paper presentation that hopefully you will find valuable.

If this is the first time you are giving a technical talk, you will not be able to follow all these recommendations at once. Like with many other things, with talks, practice makes perfect. In order to distinguish the more from the less important, a number of recommendations have been formulated as rules. Try to pay particular attention to these rules in preparing and giving your talk. You should realize that giving a good lecture is hard work and requires extensive preparation. Do not underestimate the amount of time this preparation takes.

General Approach

There are several steps involved in preparing a paper for presentation. It is highly recommended that you follow the suggested sequence of steps, and do not skip any of them. First, you need to read and understand the paper. Second, you need to adapt it for presentation. Third, you need to get a set of slides ready. Fourth, you need to do a dry run of your presentation. This will almost certainly cause you to re-iterate over steps two to four. Once you are comfortable with your presentation, you get to go on the stage. Afterwards, there will also be an evaluation process.

Understanding the Paper

The essential ingredient for a good paper presentation is that you thoroughly understand the paper and the points it is trying to make. Nice slides and a polished presentation are important, but cannot make up for a lack of understanding. Therefore, I suggest that you spend a significant amount of time trying to grasp the contents of the paper you are presenting. This may require reading additional papers as well, to get a better understanding of the context.

While it is important to understand the technical details in the paper, the primary goal in this first phase of the preparation is to understand what the key points are that the paper is trying to make. What the key points are, is a question you should evaluate in the context of the audience for which you are presenting the paper. In this particular case, you are giving a presentation in a course. Try to answer the following question: what would you, as a student in this course, like to know about this subject? Then, try to evaluate what are the key points of the paper in light of your answer to this question. Do not forget that it is a course, and that therefore for many people your presentation is their first exposure to the material. This implies that relatively high-level points are probably of more interest, while low-level details are most likely going to be lost on your audience. Your choice of what topics to cover might be different if you were to present the paper at a conference or as a job interview talk.

Adapting the Paper for Presentation

Experience indicates that the amount of information that people carry away from a lecture or a presentation is relatively small. Therefore, it is essential that you very specifically highlight the key points of the paper. People are most likely to forget the rest. It is also well known that the audience is most attentive in the beginning of a lecture. Attention then drops until the point where the speaker signals that the end of the talk is near, at which point attention levels rise again.

Rule 1: You should have a slide very early on that states the key points of the paper, and nothing else. You should have a similar slide at the end. You should decide on these slides first before you proceed.

The most common problem with student presentations has been that the student goes over the paper from A to Z, in the same order as the written paper, without adding or deleting anything. This is a very bad idea. A written paper is an archival document, and therefore it tries to be complete. With an oral presentation, one tries to relate the key points of a paper to the audience. That requires highlighting those key points, and only briefly summarizing or deleting lesser points.

Often people are not quite sure what the key points are, or they cannot make up their mind. They then try to bury the slide with the key points into an "overview" slide that outlines the paper or the talk. This is not acceptable. Having an overview slide may be a good idea, but it is never a substitute for a slide with the key points of the presentation.

Once you have gotten past this part, it is now time to develop the rest of your presentation.

Rule 2: The rest of the talk should be structured such that it elaborates and clarifies the key points.

If, for instance, the paper claims to provide some functionality not provided by earlier systems, you should specifically state what this functionality is, what it is good for, how it is accomplished, perhaps what the costs are, etc. If the paper does something better or faster than other systems, you should explain what the new concepts are that allow it to do so, and quantify the improvement. Throughout your discussion, you should occasionally return to the key points to make sure that the audience does not lose sight of the overall context.

People are often tempted to budget time to various parts of the talk in a way proportional to the amount of time they spent getting to understand the corresponding part of the paper. This is often a bad idea, because it may lead to a disproportionate amount of time being spent on tricky details that do not contribute to the overall goal of getting your audience to appreciate the paper. Tricky details are far better understood by reading the paper. Your talk should be sufficiently motivating such that people actually want to go read the paper to figure out the details. If you do decide to go into some complicated aspect of the paper, and again, you should only do so if you consider it essential, you have to explain it in real detail and budget enough time to give the audience a chance to absorb the level of detail. There is a big danger here of starting to explain some complicated aspect of the paper and try to hurry through it because it is not very important. Of course, nobody understands what you are trying to do. Attempts like this usually end with the comment "Well, I know it's complicated, I don't have the time to explain it all in detail, but I hope you got the idea". You have just confused everybody.

Many of the papers that we will read in this course have experiments, measurements, and performance results in them, "numbers" as the theoreticians say.

Rule 3: You should fully explain the purpose of the experiments, the experimental setup, the results, and the conclusions to be drawn from these results.

In other words, you should make sure that it does not come across as "a bunch of numbers" but as the account of a scientific experiment. There is nothing worse than throwing up a slide with some numbers on, and leave it at that. Even if the numbers are digested into a table or a graph, that does not relieve you of the responsibility to explain how these results were obtained, what they mean, etc. In particular, if you put up a graph or a bar chart, you must explicitly state what is on the x and the y axis. Without this information, your audience is clueless and has to start searching on the slide for the labels on the axes. Even if you put on several slides with identical looking graphs, it does not hurt to re-iterate for each one what is on the axes. More will be said about the slides used for presenting experimental results later on. You should make sure that you budget enough time for this part of your talk, as it is a frequent source of questions from the audience.

A paper presentation in this course is different from a presentation at a conference, in that you are presenting somebody else's work and you may not agree with all of it. Avoid confusion between the paper itself and your opinion of it.

Rule 4: Your talk should consist of two clearly delineated parts, one in which you present the paper as if you were the author, and a second one in which you offer an evaluation of the paper.

The emphasis in the evaluation should be on the contents of the paper and also, but to a lesser extent, on the paper's overall structure and presentation. This is also a good place to make connections with other papers we have read and cast the paper at hand into a wider context.


You should allow for approximately 45-50 minutes of presentation. This is just a guideline, not a strict upper or lower limit. In any case, you should allow for questions both during and after the talk, and also for some discussion after the talk. A good rule of thumb is to have about one slide per two minutes of talk, although this is certainly not an universal rule.

Rule 5: Use a big letter size.

I cannot stress this rule enough, so just to make sure, I will repeat it.

Rule 5: Use a big letter size or else …

There is an important corollary to this rule. Occasionally, you want to use a figure (or a table) from the paper. You should not do this by copying the figure on to a slide, but by redrawing it on a size that will be readable by your audience. In particular, units on graphs or in tables should be clearly legible. If there is too much in a particular graph in the paper, split it up in two graphs or present only part of it.

The second rule is almost equally obvious, but also often ignored.

Rule 6: Do not clutter you slides.

First, you should leave large margins, both vertical and horizontal. Be especially careful not to go too close to the bottom of the slide, as the audience may not be able to see the bottom of the screen. Second, your slides should just contain the bare essentials: no full sentences, just a few keywords. Never try to cram a lot of material on to a single side, use two or more slides instead. There is nothing wrong with a slide that is three quarters empty.

Rule 7: Your slides should be visually appealing.

A picture is almost always better than text. Long bulleted lists are boring. Try to distinguish major and minor points by using indentation, by using boldface, etc. It is a big plus if you do so consistently throughout your slides. Colors can be very appealing but must be used with care. You must be consistent. If you have two slides with horizontal lines depicting the execution of processes and arrows representing messages between them, use the same color on both slides for the processes and the same color for the messages. Over-use of color can, however, be distracting. You must also be careful with certain colors. Red and pink are indistinguishable with many projectors. Finally, you also have to be careful with using animation. In general, sparse use of animation is a plus, but be conservative: over-use quickly becomes annoying.

Rule 8: A single slide should never try to convey more than a single concept.

All slides should have a title that describes this concept. If the explanation of a concept goes on for more than one slide, then repeat the title with some qualifier, or with just "(Continued)" added to a title. Never start a new idea in the middle of a slide, or try to convey more than one concept in a single side. Use a new slide instead. As said before, there is nothing wrong with a slide that is three quarters empty.

The Dry-Run

So now you have all your slides ready.

Rule 9: You should do (at least) a couple of dry runs.

Go through the entire talk, as if you were giving it in class. Ask somebody to time it, and ask people to make notes. Some people also find it useful to give the talk in an empty room with just the video camera running. The first time you give a talk, you will be surprised to find out that a lot of people will look at you with completely empty faces. Some people will fall asleep (OK, we do not want that to happen in this class :-) ). An empty room with a video camera running will prepare you for this situation.

You will find that, after a first dry run, you will want to change a lot. In fact, it is not uncommon for people to change all of their slides after a first dry run.

Rule 10: Avoid premature optimization. Get the contents right first, and then make your slides look pretty.

After you have your talk ready, you should spend some time trying to anticipate what questions you might get during and after the talk. If the answer to a particular question you expect is difficult, prepare a slide with the answer.

One final rule.

Rule 11: Get some sleep the night before your talk.

The night before your talk is not the right time to do all of the above. Sleepwalkers do not make for exciting speakers.

To Memorize or not to Memorize?

There is often debate on how much of the talk you should memorize. Your presentation should be smooth, but at the same time it should not appear completely scripted. How much of the talk you have to memorize to accomplish this effect differs from person to person. You should definitely not have to consult your notes on a regular basis. Ideally, you should not have to do so at all. It is very useful to completely memorize the first minute of your talk. Many people are quite nervous in the beginning, and memorizing the first minute helps them get off to a smooth start. Along the same lines, you should outline in detail what you are going to say in the technically complicated parts of the talk, if any. Only the most accomplished speakers are capable of improvizing successfully at such times.

You Are on the Stage

Rule 12: Make it look like you are having a good time.

Audiences are far more forgiving if they think you are enjoying yourself. Show some enthusiasm for the subject. Speak loud and forcefully. Do not end your sentences in a mutter. Do not be afraid to raise and lower your voice, to delineate more or less important points. A moment of silence at the right time can do wonders. If you just said something important or something very complicated, let it sink in for a while before you continue. This technique will work particularly well if your slides are such that each slide introduces a new concept. Do not talk while you are changing slides, and give the audience time to absorb what was on the previous slide.

Rule 13: Make sure that the audience can always see the screen.

Do not stand in front of it, and do not block the projection of the slide on to the screen. Especially after changing slides, people tend to continue to stand right next to the projector. In a level classroom, you should go stand next to the screen after changing slides. Some speakers also move around while they are talking, a good idea when done in moderation. Also, never remove a slide before people have had a reasonable amount of time to read what is on the slide. Never flip back and forth between two or more slides. Make sure you have a pointer with you to point things out on the slide. Pointing things out with a pen or with your hands obscures the projection of the slide. Do not play with the pointer; put it down when you do not need it. Do not stand or talk for an extended period with your back towards the audience.

Rule 14: Do not try too hard to be funny.

Most people are not very funny, anyways, especially when they are nervous. There is nothing more awkward than somebody who is not funny and who is trying to be. There is nothing more likely to throw you off than to have the audience react stone cold after you tried to make a joke. In general, if something goes wrong during the talk --- most likely something will in fact go wrong --- do not let it throw you off. Also, people might not take you seriously if your talk turns into a stand-up comic act. This does not mean that you should not be able to see the humor of the situation if something funny happens. But just let it happen, do not try to make it happen. When it does happen and people start laughing, wait until the laughter dies out or nobody will have heard what you said. Also, in some situations you will be introduced before the talk, for instance for an interview talk. Some people have the extremely annoying habit of introducing the speaker by telling some supposedly funny story (In some departments this is a tradition). This is really great, because it guarantees that nobody is listening right from the beginning. If this happens to you, make absolutely sure to wait until the laughter dies out, and be very serious during the first few minutes of your talk to get things back on track.

Interacting with the Audience and Dealing with Questions

Rule 15: Look at the audience and seek eye contact with them.

Do not look at the screen, at your notes, at the slide projector, or away from the audience in any other way. Look at the whole audience, not just your friends, the instructor, the first row. You are much more likely to keep the attention of the audience going this way.

If you are really confident, you should try to engage your audience in actively participating through questions and answers. If you ask a question, you have to be willing to wait until somebody volunteers an answer. If you don't, your question will come across as perfunctory, and you will certainly not get any answers the second time you try. As said before, you have to be pretty confident to pull this off.

An important aspect of giving a talk is dealing with questions. It is also one of the most difficult to learn. The first thing you should realize here is that questions are a good thing. It means that people are listening. It does not (necessarily) mean that you did a poor job of explaining something. So maintain a positive attitude to questions and the people who are asking them. Allow the person who is asking a question to finish his sentence. Quite often, speakers jump in halfway with their response. It is rude to do so. And you are probably answering the wrong question. If the question is not quite clear to you, do not try too hard to guess what the person is asking. It is often better to ask for a clarification, or to try to re-state the question in your own words to see if you got it. This has the added advantage that it gives you some time to think, and, more importantly, it guarantees that all other members of the audience have clearly heard the question. It makes people feel good if you ask them if they understood your answer, or if your answer addressed their question. It is also perfectly acceptable to say that you do not know the answer. Do not try to hide this by not answering the question, and certainly not by making fun of the question or the questioner.

The above not withstanding, it is true that many audiences have a self-appointed designated jerk :-). Every audience also has people who do not understand a word of what you are talking about. The combination of the two, a person who repeatedly asks stupid questions on a tone of "what the hell are you talking about" can be quite deadly. This is one of the most difficult situations to deal with, and there is no universal approach to combat the problem. You are lucky if the audience contains a jerk exterminator. This is the person from the audience who casts an annoyed look over his shoulder, and gives a one-word answer to the question. If that happens, you are safe. Do not rub it in. If not, you must be very firm in not letting this person derail your talk, while remaining polite (if at all possible). One approach is to ask the jerk to defer his questions until after the talk. If he keeps on asking questions, start giving one line answers, and continue immediately without checking if he understood the answer. This situation is unlikely to occur in a course, but in general you should be prepared for it.

The Role of the Instructor

Speakers can come and see me at any time prior to the talk. Speaking from experience, there seem to be three times at which a meeting is extremely helpful. First, after you have digested the paper, a brief discussion is often useful to check if you figured out what the main points are and to clear up technical details about the paper. Second, we will go over the slides together after you are ready. Third, after you have done a dry-run and fixed up your slides, I can go over your slides again and point out further possible improvements. I strongly suggest that you come see me at least once and perhaps a second time before the talk.

At lecture time, I will introduce you, and I will lead the discussion after your talk, but you should not count on me helping you out during the talk. Although I may say or ask something, you are in charge and you should be able to handle whatever situation comes up.


After each talk I will hand out evaluation sheets, on which everyone will be asked to evaluate the presentation. I will then summarize the student evaluations, add my own comments, and provide a summary to the speaker. Your evaluations will have no effect on the speaker's grade, so I urge you to be candid and constructive. The evaluations will allow the presenter to get feedback on how the audience reacts to and perceives your presentation.

You should understand that the fact that a paper is presented by a student may occasionally take its toll on the material. The discussions after the paper presentations are meant to smooth out such problems, but they are not a perfect remedy. This is the price that you have to be willing to pay for the opportunity to practice speaking in public.

Dimitrios Koutsonikolas