From owner-cse584-sp07-list@LISTSERV.BUFFALO.EDU Sat Feb 10 16:27:21 2007 Received: from ares.cse.buffalo.edu (ares.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.79]) by castor.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.13.6/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l1ALRLCF016883 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:27:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from front3.acsu.buffalo.edu (upfront.acsu.buffalo.edu [128.205.4.140]) by ares.cse.buffalo.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id l1ALREDC065811 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:27:15 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 7034 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2007 21:27:14 -0000 Received: from mailscan3.acsu.buffalo.edu (128.205.6.135) by front3.acsu.buffalo.edu with SMTP; 10 Feb 2007 21:27:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 18735 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2007 21:27:14 -0000 Received: from deliverance.acsu.buffalo.edu (128.205.7.57) by front1.acsu.buffalo.edu with SMTP; 10 Feb 2007 21:27:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 10673 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2007 21:27:10 -0000 Received: from listserv.buffalo.edu (128.205.7.35) by deliverance.acsu.buffalo.edu with SMTP; 10 Feb 2007 21:27:10 -0000 Received: by LISTSERV.BUFFALO.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.5) with spool id 3279933 for CSE584-SP07-LIST@LISTSERV.BUFFALO.EDU; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:27:10 -0500 Delivered-To: cse584-sp07-list@listserv.buffalo.edu Received: (qmail 18291 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2007 21:27:10 -0000 Received: from mailscan3.acsu.buffalo.edu (128.205.6.135) by listserv.buffalo.edu with SMTP; 10 Feb 2007 21:27:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 14723 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2007 21:27:09 -0000 Received: from castor.cse.buffalo.edu (128.205.32.14) by smtp3.acsu.buffalo.edu with SMTP; 10 Feb 2007 21:27:09 -0000 Received: from castor.cse.Buffalo.EDU (rapaport@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by castor.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.13.6/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l1ALR9TA016871 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:27:09 -0500 (EST) Received: (from rapaport@localhost) by castor.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.13.6/8.12.9/Submit) id l1ALR9dd016870 for cse584-sp07-list@listserv.buffalo.edu; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:27:09 -0500 (EST) X-UB-Relay: (castor.cse.buffalo.edu) X-PM-EL-Spam-Prob: : 7% Message-ID: <200702102127.l1ALR9dd016870@castor.cse.Buffalo.EDU> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 16:27:09 -0500 Reply-To: "William J. Rapaport" Sender: "Philosophy of Computer Science, Spring 2007" From: "William J. Rapaport" Subject: POSITION PAPER #1 To: CSE584-SP07-LIST@LISTSERV.BUFFALO.EDU Precedence: list List-Help: , List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Owner: List-Archive: X-UB-Relay: (castor.cse.buffalo.edu) X-DCC-Buffalo.EDU-Metrics: castor.cse.Buffalo.EDU 1335; Body=0 Fuz1=0 Fuz2=0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=3.1.7 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on ares.cse.buffalo.edu X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2550/Sat Feb 10 15:25:52 2007 on ares.cse.buffalo.edu X-Virus-Status: Clean Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 13919 Content-Length: 457 A student writes: | When referring to the statements that we are supposed to agree or disagree | with, if we copy them word for word, what is the proper way to cite them? or | do we not have to? Thanks. | Given the page and word limits, you don't have to cite the premises at all (since they are clearly in the context under discussion). Just refer to them as "premise (n)" rather than copying them out word for word (which might waste valuable space).