From - Mon Apr 19 11:17:02 2004
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Path: acsu.buffalo.edu!rapaport
From: rapaport@cse.buffalo.edu (William J. Rapaport)
Newsgroups: sunyab.cse.740
Subject: MOD-HEAD CASE FRAME
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 19:42:34 -0400 (EDT)
Organization: Computer Science and Engineering
Lines: 45
Sender: Ncs@buffalo.edu
Distribution: sunyab
Message-ID: <c5pr1a$ll4$1@prometheus.acsu.buffalo.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: castor.cse.buffalo.edu
X-Trace: prometheus.acsu.buffalo.edu 1082158954 22180 128.205.32.14 (16 Apr 2004 23:42:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@buffalo.edu
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 23:42:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test76 (Apr 2, 2001)
Xref: acsu.buffalo.edu sunyab.cse.740:112

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: MOD-HEAD CASE FRAME
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Several of you have asked for the syntax and semantics of the mod-head
case frame.

There isn't any official one, and we have been using it in a rather
informal way.  Making it precise would probably be the topic of a
full-blown master's-level project.

The general idea is to use it to represent compound linguistic 
constructions that are ambiguous in nature.  Compare, for a moment,
the infamous object-rel-possessor case frame that many of you have come
to know and "love" :-).  The idea behind that one is that the
possessive construction in English (as in:  Bill's book, her hat,
etc.) is a single, compound linguistic construction that is
variously used to express ownership, part-whole, kinship, and many
other relations.  Since a parser wouldn't necessarily have the
information necessary to interpret each such occurrence correctly,
we handle them by representing that single English construction with
a single case frame, leaving to background knowledge any rules that
are needed for the full semantic interpretation.

There are other such compound constructions. The most obvious is the
adjective-noun noun phrase:  red hat, small elephant, toy gun.  Each
of these should be represented as a structured individual in SNePS,
but each has a very different semantics:  a red hat is both a hat
and red; but a small elephant is an elephant, yet not small
(although it *is* small for an elephant); and a toy gun is a toy,
but not a gun.  Instead of SNePS having to know ahead of time how to
represent each such expression, we can use the mod-head case frame
as a "neutral" representation, leaving to background knowledge the
task of deciding what kind of Adj+N  construction it is.  

We also tend to use the mod-head construction for other situations;
perhaps we shouldn't.

So, here's a first attempt at a case frame (I'll ask Stu if he has a
better idea):

[[(build mod x head y)]] = a structured individual consisting of an
individual [[y]] modified by [[x]].

That's pretty vague, but then the mod-head case frame is, too.
