Last Update: 31 May 2011
Note: or material is highlighted |
Finally, we investigate some possible motivations for the differences between NE, S[tandard]E, and L2E. We hypothesize that there might be influence from (1) the children's adstrate (i.e. the effects of bilingualism), (2) adstrate influence on the parent's Esperanto (learned as an L2), and (3) from pure nativization effects (cf. Mühlhäuser, 1980; Sankoff & Laberge, 1980; Versteegh, 1993; Samarin, 1994). This study is limited in scope in two ways. First, eight children representing six adstrate languages clearly do not represent the world's languages. (p.578)
NE will be shown below to differ from SE and from L2E in the following ways: (2.1) NE uses no compound tenses nor aspectual affixes; (2.2) it undergoes a good deal of phonological reduction, especially in grammatical suffixes and other unstressed syllables; (2.3) its sentences are mostly SVO, but both verb and object (or complement) fronting do occur; (2.4) it uses the accusative in only approximately half of its &lsquot;appropriate&rsquot; contexts; and (2.5) its stress is not always penultimate as in SE, but rather varies radically depending on the adstrate language of the NE speaker. (p.578)
[And numerous occurrences thereafter.]